Conferința BURSA - Dezvoltarea Romaniei 2018
BURSA 19.06.2018

GEORGE MARINESCU
 
mărește imaginea
     The Romanian Constitution:
     Art. 80 - The role of the president
     (1) The Romanian president represents the Romanian government and is the guarantor of national independence, unity and territorial integrity.
     (2) The Romanian president must watch for the compliance with the Constitution and the good functioning of the public authorities. For that purpose, the president serves as a mediating entity between the powers of the state, as well as between the state and society.
     The constitutional text is clear enough, but nobody wants to interpret it exactly the way it is written. Not even the magistrates of the Constitutional Court who have decided that the Romanian President has to dismiss the head of the National Anticorruption Department at the request of the Minister of Justice.
     According to art. 80 parag. 2 of the Constitution, the Romanian president watches for the compliance with the Constitution and the good functioning of public authorities.
     How does the head of state carry out this obligation to watch for the good functioning of public authorities?
     It is being stated said within the same constitutional article:
     "To that end, the President serves as a mediator between the powers of the state, as well as between the state and society."
     Exercising the mediation function to ensure the good functioning of public authorities does not mean acting the way one of those authorities asks you to. Mediation means taking note of the opinions of all the parties involved, analyzing the requests and making his own decision, not all one of that is demanded of them, be it by the Romanian Constitutional Court itself.
     Nevertheless, in the public space, there is talk about the suspension of the President of Romania for a ruling of the CCR which makes irrelevant the mediation function of the head of state and basically invalidates paragraph 2 of article 80 of the Romanian Constitution.
     Ten days have passed since the CCR published the argumentation of the decision made on May 30, by which it claims that president Klaus Iohannis needs to dismiss Laura Codruța Kovesi from her position as chief-prosecutor of the DNA.
     Since then, a rally of the "white shirts" of the PSD took place, all the sides have presented pros and cons concerning the suspension of president Iohannis, should he refuse to dismiss the head of the DNA, the visit of the delegation of the Venice Commission occurred, as well as a fierce fight in the Parliament between the government and the opposition concerning the amendment of the penal legislation.
     While PSD leader Liviu Dragnea doesn't seem willing to speak, for now, about the suspension of the President, the social-democrat vice-presidents are a little more open and have expressed opinions concerning the justifications for a potential suspension.
     Adrian Țuțuianu, Paul Stănescu, Florin Iordache, Olguța Vasilescu, Gabriela Firea are among those who claim a potential refusal by Iohannis to act the way the ruling of the CCR of May 30 would represent a violation of the Constitution, because in the motivation of the ruling it is said that such a refusal would generate an institutional deadlock among the institutions of the state.
     "If the delay isn't reasonable and the ruling of the CCR isn't applied, there will be definitely be an suspension", said Olguța Vasilescu, in a show broadcasted on the TVR.
     Deputy prime-minister Paul Stănescu said: "Yes, I am also saying that he needs to be suspended the moment he refuses to sign the dismissal. We will have to wait and see. He said that he still has a little left to read, that's what the president said, and the moment he says he doesn't agree with the ruling of the CCR, certainly, in the party, we will decide what to do next. We will analyze things from all points of view and we will make a decision within the party".
     * The scenario of the PSD: three-step suspension
     The first scenario concerning the suspension of Iohannis has been revealed by social-democrat Eugen Nicolicea. According to him, the suspension will be done in three steps.
     Step 1: Iohannis is suspended, the interim of the position of president of Romania is taken over by the president of the Senate, Călin Popescu Tăriceanu
     Step 2: Tăriceanu issues the decree for the suspension of the head of the DNA and the appointment of her replacement.
     Step 3. The parliament annuls the decision to suspend Iohannis. No referendum for his dismissal is held and the head of state returns to Cotroceni.
     The plan revealed by Eugen Nicolicea is unconstitutional. Why?
     Because once the procedure for suspending the president is initiated, it ends with the Constitutional Court acknowledging the outcome of the referendum for the dismissal of the Romanian president.
     Where does that follow from?
     From the motivation of the decision of the CCR no. 730 of July 9th, 2012, we note that "the effects of the suspension consist of the interruption of the presidential term until the validation of the referendum by the Constitutional Court."
     In other words, the suspension procedure ends after the validation of the outcome of the referendum.
     So, Nicolicea's hypothesis is not constitutionally covered concerning the third step presented by the social-democrat.
     Concerning the reasons of the suspension, in motivating the same decision 730/2012 the Court ruled that "can be considered serious acts of violation of the provisions of the Constitution the decisions or the avoidance of carrying out mandatory decisions, by which the Romanian president would prevent the functioning of public authorities, would suppress or restrain the rights and freedoms of citizens, would upset the constitutional order or would seek the change of the constitutional order or other facts of that nature which would have or might have similar effects".
     Perhaps the social-democrats are thinking that this would provide the justification for the suspension of Iohannis. They could argue that the Romanian president is avoiding the approval of the request for revocation and thus could prevent the functioning of a public authority, especially in the decision of May 30, 2018, CCR speaks about an inter-institutional deadlock, between the Ministry of Justice and the DNA.
     * The good functioning, based on the role of mediator
     But Klaus Iohannis isn't shirking the carrying out of any act. Even though the CCR says that the Romanian president needs to issue the decree to dismiss the head of the DNA, Klaus Iohannis isn't required to do that. Even if the decision of the CCR is mandatory for all citizens.
     Where does that follow from?
     According to art. 80 paragraph 2 of the Constitution, the Romanian president watches for compliance with the Constitution and the good functioning of public authorities.
     How does the head of state carry out this obligation to watch for the good functioning of the public authorities?
     It is mentioned afterwards in the same article:
     "To that end, the President carries out the position of mediation between the powers of the state, as well as between the state and society."
     "To that end, the President serves as a mediator between the powers of the state, as well as between the state and society."
     Exercising the mediation function to ensure the good functioning of public authorities does not mean acting the way one of those authorities asks you to. Mediation means taking note of the opinions of all the parties involved, analyzing the requests and making his own decision, not all one of that is demanded of them, be it by the Romanian Constitutional Court itself.
     Exercising the mediation function to ensure the good functioning of public authorities does not mean acting the way one of those authorities asks you to. Mediation means taking note of the opinions of all the parties involved, analyzing the requests and making his own decision, not all one of that is demanded of them, be it by the Romanian Constitutional Court itself.
     * The suspension, the patriotic duty of the PSD?
     In the debates concerning the suspension of Klaus Iohannis there have been two more scenarios supplied by the politically analysts and journalists invited by the news TV stations on their shows. Whether we're talking about Ion Cristoiu, Rareș Bogdan, Cozmin Gușă and others, the main issue of this period is what Iohannis is going to do with the decision of the CCR and why he needs to be suspended.
     The second scenario concerning the suspension of the Romanian president was built on Tuesday night in a show on Antena 3.
     Ion Cristoiu claimed that the president has already violated the Romanian Constitution because he is for now refusing to enact the ruling of the CCR. Another reason why Iohannis might be suspended would be if he refuses to pass the laws concerning the Supreme Council of Magistrates, the judicial organization and those amending certain norms of the Penal Code and Penal Procedure Code.
     "It is a patriotic duty of the PSD to immediately suspend Klaus Iohannis and to organize the referendum. He has clearly violated the Constitution. The PSD might as well step down from the government right now, if it doesn't happen now, no other law will be promulgated. What will the PSD do if the president refuses to pass the laws? Klaus Iohannis will not sign the revocation simply because he doesn't want to. If the president won't sign, it's over", said Ion Cristoiu.
     He also presented what is going to happen if the President is suspended. Tăriceanu would have to enact the decision of the CCR and to promulgate the normative acts concerning the amendment of the criminal legislation.
     * June 20, the date of the suspension of Iohannis?
     The third scenario was presented by Realitatea TV on the show "Jocuri de putere" ("Power games") moderated by Rareș Bogdan. According to him, the PSD-ALDE coalition, even though it isn't speaking openly about the suspension of Klaus Iohannis, doesn't mean it isn't preparing it.
     And the scenario described by Rareș Bogdan has five steps.
     In the first phase, the scenario of 2012 would repeat itself, since the suspension of Traian Băsescu. The majority coalition PSD-ALDE is preparing a shared session of the two chambers of Parliament, which is set to be held on June 20, one day prior to the date set by the High Court of Cassation and Justice for the rendering of the ruling on the merit of the "Bombonica" case, where the prosecutors have asked for an exemplary punishment for defendant Liviu Dragnea: 7 years and 6 months of prison.
     Moreover, the prosecutors have asked the court, if it sentences Dragnea to prison, to take into account that he is a repeat offender, as he already has a definitive suspended conviction in the Referendum case, and, even if this time we have a ruling on the merit of the case, the magistrates need to issue the immediate incarceration of the PSD leader.
     On the occasion of the common joint plenum session of June 20 2018, the majority coalition would change the agenda and put up for debate the suspension of the Romanian president, which it would also approve on the same day.
     But this fast-forward plan has a flaw. In order to effectively suspend Iohannis, the Parliament first needs to ask for the consultative opinion of the Constitutional Court. Which would mean that in the following days, the CCR would render a ruling on such a request formulated by the majority coalition.
     Moreover, in the motivation of the ruling no. 730 of July 9, 2012 it is stated that "only the Parliament can decide on the suspension of the President, as it is given this power, and once the parliamentary procedure for the suspension of the president of Romania is launched, according to the Constitution, it can no longer be stopped" and that it ends with the validation by the CCR of the referendum for the dismissal of the president.
     According to article 95 paragraph 3 of the Romanian constitution that referendum must be held within at most 30 days from the date of the President's suspension.
     * The replacement of the heads of the DNA and the DIICOT, priorities of the interim
     The second step after the suspension of Iohannis would be for the president of the Senate, Călin Popescu Tăriceanu, to become an interim president of Romania.
     The coming step in this scenario involves the interim president signing the decree for the dismissal of Laura Codruța Kovesi.
     That step is possible, because the dismissal of the head of the DNA is among the actions that the interim president may take.
     According to art. 98 paragraph 2 of the Romanian Constitution, the interim president of Romania may not exercise the roles stipulated in articles 88-90 and which concern messages addressed to the Parliament, the dissolution of the Parliament and the holding of a referendum concerning matters of national interest.
     The fourth step in this scenario, stipulates that the interim president would pass the entire legislative package concerning the judicial system. That is also possible, because it is not among the actions prohibited by the provisions of art. 95 paragraph 2 of the Romanian Constitution.
     The step also stipulates the replacement of Daniel Horodniceanu as head of the DIICOT or his removal from the investigation of the complaint brought about by Ludovic Orban, the head of the PNL, against prime-minister Viorica Dăncilă.
     At any rate, currently, in the Cotroceni, there is the proposal submitted by justice minister Tudorel Toader, a request which has received a positive opinion from the prosecutors division of the Supreme Council of Magistrates, concerning the appointment as chief-prosecutor of the DIICOT of Felix Bănilă. And so, the interim president could issue two decrees at once: the termination of the interim of Horodniceanu and the appointment of Felix Bănilă, Tudorel Toader's man.
     * Iohannis, one step ahead of this scenario
     The fifth step of this scenario stipulates that this interim president appoints as the head of the Romanian Foreign Intelligence Service a member of the Social Democrat Party. Unfortunately for those who built this scenario, Romanian president, Klaus Iohannis got ahead of them and yesterday nominated Gabriel Vlase, an MP from the PSD, as head of the SIE. The proposal has left the Parliament and the only thing left to happen is the vote for the new head of the SIE to be appointed through a Presidential decree and to take over the position.
     The last step in the scenario for the suspension of Iohannis stipulates the recreation, under a new name, of the political police for magistrates, the former SIPA and DGPA, which would be meant to allow politicians to blackmail judges and prosecutors working the major corruption cases.
     We think that such an approach isn't possible, because it would clearly violate European regulations in the sector, which stipulate that judges and prosecutors need to be independent from all points of view in the activity they conduct. If that item were implemented, Romania would be at risk of grave sanctions from the Brussels Commission, the seizing of the European funds and the suspension of the voting rights.
     Like the saying goes, where there's smoke there's fire. The fact that there is so much talk about the suspension of Klaus Iohannis shows that in the labs of the majority coalition of PSD-ALDE this is being analyzed, intensely debated and prepared.
     What are the social-democrats waiting for? The clear refusal of Iohannis to comply with the decision of the Romanian Constitutional Court of May 30 2018, which states that the Romanian president needs to dismiss the head of the DNA. And then there is the reasonable delay which Iohannis has referred to and which is also mentioned in article 91 paragraph 1 of the Romanian Constitution concerning the roles of the President when it comes to foreign policy, a deadline which isn't clearly specified anywhere in terms of how many days or months it encompasses. 
 

 
Readers' comments    [ add a comment ] 
Trimite părerea ta.
Nume (maxim 50 caractere)
E-mail (optional)
Titlu (maxim 50 caractere)
Mesaj
 
REGULAMENTUL MESAJELOR
Acord
Prin trimiterea opiniei ne confirmați că ați citit regulamentul de mai sus și că vă asumați prevederile sale !
Aceeasi sectiune (English Section)
BECAUSE AN AGREEMENT ON THE PRICE COULDN'T BE REACHED,
Ediții precedente
Newsletter Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn RSS
Jurnal Bursier
21.09.2018
BVB
     * Rulaj de 47 milioane de lei, peste media anului
     
     Piața principală a Bursei de Valori București (BVB) a încheiat ședința de tranzacționare de joi preponderent în teritoriul pozitiv, opt dintre...  click să citești tot articolul
20.09.2018
BVB
     * Scădere de 0,53% pentru BET-NG
     
     Volumul de tranzacționare înregistrat în ședința de la mijlocul săptămânii a Bursei de Valori București (BVB) a fost de 33,45 milioane de lei, dintre care...  click să citești tot articolul
20.09.2018
BURSELE DIN LUME
     Bursele din Europa au urcat ieri, pe fondul câștigurilor din sectorul materiilor prime.  click să citești tot articolul
19.09.2018
BVB
     * Toți indicii bursieri au închis în creștere
     * Tranzacții cu aproape 3% din MedLife, efectuate pe piața "deal"
     
     Lichiditatea înregistrată în ședința de tranzacționare de ieri la...  click să citești tot articolul
19.09.2018
BURSELE DIN LUME
     Piețele europene au urmat un curs mixt ieri, după ce administrația americană a decis să impună taxe vamale de 10% pe importuri chinezești de 200 de miliarde de dolari.  click să citești tot articolul
18.09.2018
BVB
     * Rulaj de 42 milioane de lei, în apropierea mediei acestui an
     
     Cinci dintre cei nouă indici ai Bursei de Valori București (BVB) au încheiat prima ședință de tranzacționare a săptămânii ușor în...  click să citești tot articolul
Cotații Internaționale

Curs Valutar

Curs valabil din data de 21 septembrie 2018
1 Dolar australian...
1 Leva bulgărească...
1 Dolar canadian....
1 Franc elvețian...
1 Coroană cehă...
1 Coroană daneză...
1 Liră egipteană...
1 Euro...
1 Liră sterlină...
100 Forinți maghiari...
100 Yeni japonezi...
1 Leu moldovenesc...
1 Coroană norvegiană...
1 Zlot polonez...
1 Rublă rusească...
1 Coroană suedeză...
1 Liră turcească...
1 Dolar S.U.A...
1 Rand sud-african...
1 Real brazilian...
1 Renminbi chinezesc...
1 Rupie indiană...
100 Woni sud-coreeni...
1 Peso mexican...
1 Dolar neo-zeelandez...
1 Dinar sârbesc...
1 Hryvna ucraineană...
1 Dirham emirate arabe...
1 Kuna croată...
1 Bahtul thailandez...
1 Gram aur...
1 DST...
AUD
BGN
CAD
CHF
CZK
DKK
EGP
EUR
GBP
HUF
JPY
MDL
NOK
PLN
RUB
SEK
TRY
USD
ZAR
BRL
CNY
INR
KRW
MXN
NZD
RSD
UAH
AED
HRK
THB
XAU
XDR
2.8801
2.3806
3.0614
4.1351
0.1822
0.6242
0.2206
4.6559
5.2123
1.4386
3.5050
0.2364
0.4852
1.0851
0.0595
0.4496
0.6306
3.9517
0.2773
0.9692
0.5774
0.0547
0.3541
0.2093
2.6455
0.0394
0.1409
1.0759
0.6269
0.1220
153.4508
5.5550
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
..Lei
click aici pentru cursurile pieței valutare - istoric
English Section
14.09.2018
MREPORT BY TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL
     Globalization has also brought with it an unpleasant effect: cross-border corruption. According to the intermediate report Exporting Corruption for the year 2018, a document drawn up by the organization Transparency International, there is a practice among powerful foreign companies of bribing the public servants of another country when they want to enter the local market.  click here to read the entire article
07.09.2018
DEPUTY VIRGIL POPESCU, VICEPRESIDENT OF THE COMMISSION FOR INDUSTRIES AND SERVICES
     The offshore law will once again reach the Commission, in one or two weeks, according to Mr. Virgil Popescu, the vice-president of the Commission for Industries and Services, the Chamber of Deputies.  click here to read the entire article
05.09.2018
MRS. FIREA'S VERBAL BOMBS
     * "There have been attempts for the prefect to be made a scapegoat"
     * "The support from the government wasn't much to talk about, so if it were withdrawn, there wouldn't be much of a difference"
     Bucharest's General Mayor was heard on Tuesday as a witness by the prosecutors of the General Prosecutor's Office in the case concerning the events which happened on August 10th in Victoriei Square. Before going into the Prosecutors' Department building, Gabriela Firea said she stood by her statements made immediately after the meeting of the National Executive Committee of the PSD and said: "I always speak based on facts, not just in this particular case, but in other areas as well, including politics. I will be answering to the questions of the prosecutor who contacted me and told me I was supposed to be heard in the case which is now being investigated concerning the intervention of the gendarmes on August 10th".  click here to read the entire article
31.08.2018
     The particularly hot weather and the conditions of extreme draught in Europe have brought to light terrible warnings from the past.
     Associated Press recently wrote that in the riverbed of the Elba in the Czech Republic have resurfaced the giant stones known as "the hunger stones", which have indicated over time, the coming of hard times.
     "When you see me, weep", is written on one of these stones, which seems to be considered the best hydrological benchmark in Europe. The inscription is in German and dates back to 1616.
     A detailed analysis of the stone inscriptions was published by the Czech researchers in the "Climate of the Past" magazine in 2013 (author's note: "Droughts in the Czech Lands, 1090-2012 AD", April 2013).  click here to read the entire article
29.08.2018
     * Claudiu Cazacu, XTB România: "United States companies have posted results that even exceeded the analysts' expectations, which were already for 2-figure profit increases"
     * Liviu Moldovan, financial analyst: "Currently, investors have a «blind» faith in the stock markets, in general, and in that of the US, in particular"
     For the first time in the history of the American markets, Nasdaq has surpassed the psychological level of 8,000 points.
     In the August 27 session, the Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) index also reached an all time high, ending the trading session at almost 2,897 points.  click here to read the entire article
27.08.2018
     The capital market was marked, last week, by a number of controversial statements tied to the listing of Digi Communications, starting from the statements made recently by Darius Vâlcov, state advisor on the team of the prime-minister, who wrote on his Facebook page that he has asked the Financial Oversight Authority (ASF) if it was true that the book value of the Digi shares was 1 leu and 8 bani, and pointed out that at the time of the IPO, the shares of Digi were listed at 40 lei and are currently priced at 28 lei (30% down) and keep going down.  click here to read the entire article
23.08.2018
     Angela Merkel inaugurated the highway in December 2005, less than a month after she became chancellor of Germany.
     The highway was built on the territory of the former East Germany, connects Lubeck and the Polish border, after the junction with A11, and goes through the electoral precinct of chancellor Merkel.  click here to read the entire article
20.08.2018
THE NATIONAL MINERAL RESOURCES AGENCY, IN A NOTIFICATION TO THE PRIME-MINISTER:
     The Romanian government has lost over 8 billion lei, between 2006-2018, following the failure to update the royalties paid by the oil and gas companies, says Gigi Dragomir, the president of the National Mineral Resources Agency (ANRM), in a report sent to the prime-minister.  click here to read the entire article
15.08.2018
      * (Interview with Radu Grațian Ghețea, President - CEO of CEC Bank)
     In banking there are many risks and that is why banks need to be flexible and have as diverse an exposure as possible, which take the market circumstances at the time into account, says Radu Grațian Ghețea, President and CEO of CEC Bank. He told us, in an interview: "We have to adapt to what is happening in the market and we need to do things in such a way that the economic activity and that of the bank both function properly. If we're going with the idea that we want to eliminate every risk, then we'll just stop doing anything. For instance, we have been and we are a bank which heavily funds agriculture, which also means animal husbandry. A few years ago, our exposure to the aviculture sector was rather significant, and when the avian flu came we had to cover some non-performing loans on that segment. Now that the avian flu is done, we are facing the swine flu. What should we do, stop lending?"
     Reporter: Lately, there have been opinions from some experts who are saying that there is a wave of non-performing loans of the ones taken out by the First Home Program. What is your comment on these statements?  click here to read the entire article
08.08.2018
     * (Interview with Laszlo Diosi, OTP Bank CEO)
     Reporter: How would you describe the banking market, at the present time?
     Laszlo Diosi: Even though there are plenty of challenges, there are also many opportunities for the Romanian banking system. The lessons of the financial-economic crisis have resulted in a better regulated framework, stable, transparent and predictable. The guiding line of the policies developed by the authorities that are qualified, but in particular by those with a regulatory and oversight role has been characterized by a balance between profitability and systemic safety.
     But there is no shortage of challenges. We are talking here about challenges which concern the digitalization of the banking system and the national and international legislation. The entire system needs to align with complex and sometimes confused regulations.
     Recorded by Emilia Olescu  click here to read the entire article
31.07.2018
     * (Interview with Dan Paul, the president of the Association of Brokers)
     The management of the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BVB) needs to find out from brokers whether Romania truly needs a derivatives market, says Dan Paul, the president of the Association of Brokers, who was kind enough to grant BURSA an interview.  click here to read the entire article
27.07.2018
THE DĂNCILĂ GOVERNMENT AFTER SIX MONTHS
     Now we know why prime-minister Dăncilă was in a hurry to announce the activity report for the first six months at the helm of the Romanian government: the nice tale of the hike of pensions and salaries wasn't supposed to be overshadowed by the evolution of budget expenses, whose increase has led the deficit of the consolidated general budget to 1.61% of the GDP, from 0.88% after the first five months of the year.  click here to read the entire article
23.07.2018
BECAUSE AN AGREEMENT ON THE PRICE COULDN'T BE REACHED,
     The public offer started by Vimetco and Conef for a stake of at most 53.77% of the shares of Alro Slatina (Alro) has been unsuccessful, as the issuer announced that due to the unfavorable market conditions, the shareholders, company and underwriters couldn't agree on a price for the volume of 383.79 million shares put up for sale.  click here to read the entire article
23.07.2018
ECONOMIC ANALYST AURELIAN DOCHIA PREDICTS:
     * According to Eurostat, Romania has the biggest governmental deficit in the EU
     The hike of some taxes, in the near future, is unavoidable, according to economic analyst Aurelian Dochia.
     His statement comes as, in the first quarter, the government's deficit has seen an increase over the last quarter of 2017, according to data by the European Statistics Office (Eurostat).  click here to read the entire article
13.07.2018
Russia World Cup
     The final tournament of the World Football Cup will end with a gala representation, the duel between Croatia and France. France, the with the most expensive players in the tournament, has met the expectations, Croatia is the biggest surprise the of the competition.  click here to read the entire article
.