The global political crisis is not an ideological deviation, but the result of an accumulated economic imbalance, in which the concentration of wealth and the expansion of debt have simultaneously eroded state capacity and social trust.
Data presented at the opening of the World Economic Forum in Davos outline a coherent picture, even if fragmented across different speeches: wealth is concentrating at an accelerating pace, debt is expanding structurally, and politics is losing its capacity to mediate. These are not three distinct crises, but a single mechanism with multiple effects.
• Wealth concentration narrows the political space
According to a report published by Oxfam in January, the wealth of billionaires increased by more than 16% in 2025, surpassing $18 trillion, while nearly half of the world's population lives in extended forms of poverty or vulnerability. This concentration is not only economic, but also political: accumulated capital translates into influence over legislation, public agendas, and information flows.
The result is a structural asymmetry: political decisions are made within an increasingly narrow framework, while costs are broadly distributed. When a shrinking segment of society can shape the rules of the game, democracy becomes formal, and social conflict turns latent.
• Debt expands pressure on the state
In parallel, global debt exceeded $340 trillion at the beginning of 2026, according to estimates by the Institute of International Finance. The problem lies not only in its size, but in the function it serves: states are compelled to prioritize financial stability over social cohesion.
Public spending becomes reactive rather than strategic. Investments in education, healthcare, and social infrastructure are postponed or underfunded, while maintaining market confidence becomes the dominant imperative. In this framework, politics can no longer offer direction-only crisis management.
• When trust breaks, political crisis emerges
The combined effect of wealth concentration and debt burden is visible in public perception data. Edelman's Trust Barometer 2026 shows that nearly 70% of respondents believe institutional leaders deliberately mislead the public. This level of distrust transcends electoral cycles and signals a crisis of legitimacy.
It is within this vacuum that the political phenomena dominating the global agenda emerge: extreme polarization, economic nationalism, challenges to multilateral institutions, and the radicalization of public discourse-not as ideology, but as a reaction to perceived exclusion.
• Davos as a symptom, not a solution
In this context, Davos is not the cause of global discontent, but a barometer of it. Elites discuss dialogue in a world where economic mechanisms continuously shrink the space for genuine dialogue. Protests around the forum, the rise of anti-system rhetoric, and public withdrawal of institutional trust are expressions of the same dynamic.
The central problem is not a lack of ideas, but a lack of political space to implement them. As long as inequality deepens and debt remains the primary operating instrument of states, politics will continue to be perceived as the administration of imbalances rather than a source of solutions.
• A crisis of architecture, not of will
The link between inequality, debt, and political crisis is not cyclical or accidental. It defines the current architecture of the world. Without structural corrections-fiscal, institutional, and governance-related-tensions will not dissipate, but intensify, regardless of economic cycles or leadership changes.
Davos 2026 clearly shows where the world stands. The open question is whether the political system still has the capacity to take it in a different direction.






































Reader's Opinion